Article 59
Authorisation of crypto-asset service providers
Related Technical Standards & Guidelines
Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS)
- RTSESMAIn force
CASP Authorisation RTS
Specifies the information to be provided in applications for authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/305
- RTSESMAIn force
Complaints Handling RTS
Requirements, templates and procedures for handling complaints by crypto-asset service providers.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/294
- RTSESMAIn force
CASP Conflicts of Interest RTS
Specifies requirements for policies and procedures on conflicts of interest for crypto-asset service providers.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1142
- RTSESMAIn force
Record-Keeping RTS
Specifies the records to be maintained by CASPs including format and retention period.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/293
- RTSESMAIn force
Client Disclosure RTS
Specifies disclosure requirements for risks, costs, charges and pricing to clients.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/302
Implementing Technical Standards (ITS)
- ITSESMAIn force
CASP Authorisation Forms ITS
Standard forms, templates and procedures for CASP authorisation applications.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/413
Guidelines
Questions & Answers
- Q&AESMAIn force
Staking Services
Clarifies that staking services require CASP authorisation for custody. Staking-as-a-service is ancillary to custody services under Article 75.
- Q&AESMAIn force
Transfer Services Scope
Clarifies when crypto-asset transfer offered as part of custody or execution services should be regarded as a component of such services.
- Q&AESMAIn force
CASP Agents
MiCA does not provide a regulatory framework for agents. A CASP cannot designate agents to provide crypto-asset services on its behalf.
- Q&AESMAIn force
Proprietary Trading
Clarifies whether firms dealing on own account with crypto-assets require a CASP license. Answer provided by European Commission.
- Q&AESMAIn force
Copy Trading Services
MiFID II guidance on copy trading applies mutatis mutandis to MiCA. CASPs must assess which service(s) are triggered on case-by-case basis.
- Q&AESMAIn force
Service Classification (RTO vs Exchange)
NCAs should assess operational reality, not just CASP's self-classification. Distinguishes reception/transmission of orders from exchange services.
Related Recitals (Preamble)
Recitals provide interpretive context and policy rationale for the legislative provisions.
CASP regulation rationale
Summary: In most Member States, the provision of crypto-asset services is not yet regulated despite the potential risks that they pose to investor protection, market integrity and financial stability.
CASP EU establishment requirement
Summary: In order to enable effective supervision and to eliminate the possibility of evading or circumventing supervision, crypto-asset services should only be provided by legal persons that have a registered...
National competent authority powers
Summary: Given the relatively small scale to date of crypto-asset service providers, the power to authorise and supervise such service providers should be conferred upon national competent authorities.